One day Toni Bernhard got sick and she never got better.

The illness she contracted first reduced then eliminated her capacity to work, to travel, and eventually to do most of the things that had previously defined her life. Activity of any sort – even a brief visit with family members – depleted her so much that it would take her days to recover. Her life became confined almost entirely to her bed.

That’s how it is with chronic illness. One moment you’re going along living your life, the next moment something is wrong. At first you don’t think of it as a life-transforming occurrence. You assume that your life  will return soon enough to the way it was before. But instead you continue not getting better. The cognitive awareness that the course of your life has been altered occurs over months or years, as your symptoms persist or worsen and you spend more and more money going to doctors in search of a diagnosis that will explain what’s going on, in search of a treatment that will heal you.

Sometimes a diagnosis comes, sometimes it doesn’t. Sometimes a treatment exists, other times it doesn’t. Maybe you will get better, maybe you won’t. In far too many cases, you are compelled over time to accept, first, that you may never have a good understanding of what is wrong with you, and second, that your life is now defined by your illness. You try to figure out a way to hold this deep uncertainty. You struggle to know whether to fight or to accept the new limitations on your  life. You try not to let yourself hope too hard…but you also try not to let yourself abandon hope.

The central question of your life becomes: how do you hold all of this ambiguity and uncertainty and loss in mind, without going mad?

 

That is precisely the question that Toni Bernhard addresses in How to be Sick.

Bernhard has written this beautiful book (which in form and style resembles in many ways the work of other Buddhist authors like Pema Chodron and Thich Naht Hanh), with the wisdom and clarity that come from having faced unimaginable difficulties with a powerful intellect and a humble spirit. The result is that she is able to articulate deep truths with an elegant lucidity.

The book opens with a brief recounting of the story of how Bernhard became, and then remained ill, after contracting a chronic-fatigue type illness which remains largely undefined and untreatable. Powerful though this story is, it isn’t the primary focus of the book. Rather, it’s the backdrop against which Bernhard illustrates the Buddhist techniques and principles which she has learned to use to transform her experience of illness.

This is an eminently graceful book, at once simple and profound, which will be extremely valuable to anyone who suffers with chronic illness. But to be clear: although the techniques which Bernhard describes here are based in Buddhist teachings, you don’t in any way need to be a practicing Buddhist to make use of them. Like all Buddhist principles, they are essentially psychological in nature. In fact, they are the same sorts of techniques that I use of in my psychotherapy practice to help people cope with difficult situations that are out of their control.

If I could distill the message of the book down to a single sentence it would be this: though we must inevitably suffer through the physical ills and limitations of our bodies, we don’t need to add mental suffering on top of our physical pain. In fact, we have the power to define for ourselves what attitude we take toward our own experience. Even as our bodies suffer, we can find mental liberation.

This powerful concept extends far beyond the experience of illness. The techniques Bernhard describes here are useful for any number of ordinary situations. How do we react when we’re stuck in a traffic jam? What do we tell ourselves when we succumb to temptation and over-eat or drink too much? How do we think about ourselves when we experience anger toward someone we love?

The techniques in How to be Sick can be usefully applied to any of these situations. But they have special relevance to the experience of chronic illness.

To give just one example from the many in the book, Berhnard describes a simple practice aimed at helping us dis-identify with our illness. She relates the story of a teacher named Munindra-ji who was travelling to visit a sacred Buddhist site in India. Stuck for hours in a hot train station without food or bathrooms, his students became worried about him. But when asked if he was all right, he replied: “There is heat here, but I am not hot. There is hunger here, but I am not hungry. There is irritation here, but I am not irritated.”

The simple beauty of this statement is piercing and poignant. So much suffering arises out of our rigid identification with our physical state. We believe (usually without realizing that we are doing so) that we are our body.

Bernhard takes this simple practice and applies it to her experience of illness. She tries saying to herself: “There is sickness here, but I am not sick.”

With those words, our state of mind can start to change. From those words, a series of questions emerge.

“Who am I?” Bernhard asks herself. “What is Toni Bernhard? Is Toni Bernhard a solid physical and mental entity with an inherent self-existence or is Toni Bernhard a label attached to an ever-changing constellation of qualities?”

Asking this question opens up space in our minds to challenge the seemingly obvious bond between our physical experience and our definition of self. That this association can be challenged is a truly radical concept.

 

That phrase – “there is sickness here, but I am not sick” – is one that I have been saying to myself often since reading this book. Because, as readers of this blog will understand, I have been drawn to this book as the result of my own struggle with chronic illness.

For me it began several years ago with some subtle shifts in my strength and energy, which evolved into a puzzling and frightening set of symptoms which I spent two years trying unsuccessfully to get diagnosed. This past summer, just as I gave up hope of getting an answer and resigned myself to accepting that I might never know what was wrong with me, I received a diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

That diagnosis gave me some answers while simultaneously giving me a new set of ambiguities and uncertainties to struggle with. Though I undoubtedly have it, the very existence of chronic Lyme disease is hotly debated by medical professionals. This makes it difficult at times to simply relax into a definition of my condition. Further, the treatments for chronic Lyme are both controversial and inconsistently effective. To put it simply: no one really knows with certainty what treatment will work for each infected individual. And to put it personally: six months of treatment hasn’t had the slightest impact on my own health.

How do I hold this complex reality in mind? How do I think about my identity as I navigate the series of losses that this disease has imposed upon me?

As it happened, during the period that I was searching for a diagnosis I was also writing a book, The Next Ten Minutes, which contains a series of techniques for weaving mindfulness practices into the habitual routines of everyday life. Much like Toni Bernhard, I was living my life at the intersection of mindfulness and chronic illness.

It was only logical that I should try to find ways to use my own mindfulness practices to cope with my experience of illness and uncertainty. But as my readers will be aware, I am at best an inconsistent Buddhist. I believe deeply in the psychological power of Buddhist practices. I teach them to my clients all the time. I try to incorporate them regularly into my life, but more often than not I am irregular and unsystematic in my practice.

Clearly I needed something more than my own advice. I needed a better guide.

When I saw the title of Bernhard’s book I understood that she was precisely the guide I needed at this point in my life. I knew this with certainty even before I knew what was actually inside her book,

I believe that words have great power. I believe that holding certain simple phrases in mind can significantly affect our experience. In writing my own book, I hoped that the words The Next Ten Minutes would have this sort of power. The words How to be Sick absolutely work in this way. You cannot hold that phrase in mind without challenging your assumptions about illness. It’s a phrase which deftly tricks us into a self-reflective stance toward those assumptions. They are words which communicate the essential truth within Bernhard’s book: we have the freedom and power to transform the way we think about our experience.

In helping me see this, Toni Bernhard has given me a gift. I sincerely hope that you will be able to experience her gift as well.

Share
 

Part Two: Insidious Onset


[Part one of this series described the early history of my physical symptoms while also identifying a series of diagnostic dilemmas.]


Receiving a diagnosis…being a diagnosis

Although I don’t usually think of myself in these terms, I am in fact a diagnostician by training. As a psychotherapist, it’s an integral part of my work which serves two basic functions. The first is mundane and uncomfortable: in order to be reimbursed for my services by insurers I need to provide those insurers with a reimbursable diagnosis for my patient. The second is more complex and more poignant: I am beginning the process of putting words to human suffering. And in psychotherapy, putting words to suffering is the way in which healing happens.

A more mechanistic way of saying this is that diagnosis guides treatment. More than a label, a diagnosis gives me a framework from which I can attempt to help.

Central though the task is however, diagnosis and mental health have never meshed well. Witness the interminable wars over the definition of categories and criteria for each new version of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (the “bible” of mental health diagnosis). You don’t usually see vicious debates breaking out between doctors (and pundits and advocacy groups and ordinary people) over the definition of Arthritis, say, or Measles. Unlike mental health diagnoses, such conditions are characterized by clear-cut and physically observable symptoms, which can be confirmed by empirical lab tests.

Although, as will become clear as my own story plays out, when medicine bumps up against the outer edges of objectively definable symptoms (as in the case of conditions like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, say, or Fibromyalgia), the same sorts of debates begin to flare up.

In mental health the discomfort around diagnosis speaks to an underlying dilemma in how we think of ourselves as human beings. As a mental health worker I am trained to value the uniqueness of each human experience. As a result I recognize how easily a diagnostic label can conflate with and distort a person’s identity. Because we don’t say “I have Depression,” but rather “I am depressed.” We don’t say “she suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder,” but rather “she’s borderline.” That tension exists in patients as well as clinicians. Part of us wants our experience to be clearly definable; another part of us insists that mystery lies at the core of our unique human experience.


Completely correct, absolutely wrong

From time to time I teach diagnosis to graduate counseling students, and it is always an invigorating experience. Counseling students commonly approach the DSM with a high degree of wariness, even hostility. They see it as a medical model which imposes a pathology-based perspective on human experience, contrary to the strength-based compassion from they wish to operate.

I tell them that are completely correct. And I also insist that they are absolutely wrong.

I suggest that they consider a simple, specific scenario.

Say you’re a counselor and someone comes to you saying that they are feeling overwhelmed by sadness over the break-up of a romantic relationship. As a counselor, how do you help them while refraining from imposing a diagnosis on them?

The answer to that question quickly reveals the many subtle levels of diagnosis that take place within all of our human interactions.

The hardcore counselor-type will maintain, following the technique of Carl Rogers, that simply listening and compassionately reflecting back a person’s experience is all that is necessary.

But what is it, exactly, that you are reflecting?

“You’re feeling really sad because your girlfriend left you.”

You may not be assigning a diagnosis in making that statement, but you are agreeing with (and thus reinforcing) your client’s self-diagnosis.

And where are you going to go from there? How are you going to help?

I maintain that you can’t move forward in any way without holding some sort of diagnostic theory in mind. I don’t think it’s possible for a counselor to set aside your own assessment of the meaning and causes of their client’s condition. Further, I believe that it’s potentially dangerous for us to believe that we can do that.

To be clear, this is a different level of diagnosis than the DSM code you put down on the form that you submit to an insurer. Diagnosing with the DSM is a process rife with problems. But that doesn’t mean that diagnosis itself is the problem. Because a diagnostic process of some sort is essential to our ability to make sense of other people (and ourselves). We understand others by attributing meaning to their words and actions. But of course the meaning that we assign may or may not correspond to the meaning others give it. Many who are drawn to mental health professions are uneasy with the idea of claiming an authority which allows them to interpret the behavior and the experience of others. This uneasiness is a good thing. Because there’s a power in that authority that can easily be mishandled or abused. The challenge of diagnosis lies in being able to recognize that while assigning a diagnosis to a human experience helps us to make sense of that experience, it simultaneously increases the risk of our misunderstanding that experience.


Refugee

There is a certain category of medical patient whose fundamental goal in interacting with medical professionals is solely to obtain a diagnosis. For that person, the meaning of a diagnosis transcends the meaning it might have in more routine medical interactions.

Say you’ve got a bad sore throat and your doctor does a culture and identifies it as strep. That is not an event which fundamentally alters your definition of yourself. But if instead you suffer from vague and shifting symptoms, if those symptoms come to shape your day-to-day experience, if they persist for months and years, and if no one in the medical profession can identify an empirical basis for those symptoms…

Well, that’s the situation I was about to find myself in. I was joining the ranks of the medical refugees. And from the perspective of a medical refugee a diagnosis – any diagnosis – becomes the holy grail. Because without a diagnosis, no one can treat you. In this situation even a really nasty diagnosis – MS, ALS, cancer – becomes preferable to living your life knowing something is very wrong without being able to identify what it is. Just as your identity and your experience has become shaped by your symptoms, the search for a coherent diagnosis becomes a profound search for meaning and self-definition. It’s a search for truth.

As I described in my previous post, the diagnoses that I had been given (or had assigned to myself) to make sense of the changes in my sexual functioning included normal aging, endocrine imbalance, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. The first was untreatable, the latter two had been treated without a resolution of the underlying symptoms, suggesting either that the treatment was inadequate or that the diagnosis was inaccurate.

And things were about to get much more complicated.


Markers

Although there are certain clear markers, the changes in my functioning didn’t happen abruptly. Rather, it was what the medical field refers to as an “insidious onset.”

Through the summer of 2008 I was continuing to see the endocrinologist, who was looking carefully at my blood levels as he tried to fine-tune the dosage of my testosterone and thyroid medication.  He witnessed one of those markers – an inexplicable abdominal rash that developed that summer. It was blistery and itchy and it persisted for six weeks or so. It was odd, nothing like anything I’d ever had before, and I noticed it without knowing what to make of it. He looked at it and did more or less the same thing that I did. He said, “hmmm.” Then he went about his business.

Around the same time I developed what I first assumed was an ordinary running injury. Every morning when I went out on my run I began getting sharp shooting pains in my left leg after about a half mile in. I assumed it was a pulled muscle of the sort I’d had in the past. My first response was simply to try to power through it. When it didn’t go away on its own, I laid off of running for awhile – that had always worked before. But it didn’t help this time. And worse, I began experiencing the same pain in other situations (driving was especially bad) and I started experiencing a series of other sharp pains in my lower back and leg.

Finally I went to my doctor, who said it was Sciatica. A nice, clean diagnosis. He prescribed an anti-inflammatory and some physical therapy. The treatment helped a little, but it didn’t eliminate the pain, which I continue to experience intermittently. It was an interesting diagnosis because it seemed both accurate and insufficient. I continue to wonder what, if any role this particular symptom plays in the larger diagnostic picture.

In order to avoid activating the sciatic pain I switched to biking for exercise. But I began to experience a heavy exhaustion when I biked at my usual pace up even very moderate hills. As a (former) distance runner, I am very attuned to the responses of my body to different levels of exertion, and so I could clearly recognize this as a change in how my body was performing. This was not just the ordinary aerobic effects of a good work out. This was a feeling of internal collapse.

It was odd and it was very distinct. It’s usually the place I start when doctors take a history, because it’s the clearest early symptom related to the fatigue and weakness that I suffer from presently. It is a key marker in my subjective experience as well, one of the few things that has been consistent over these past few years: when I exert myself beyond a certain level, I experience a physical collapse which is marked by a feeling of weakness, shakiness and light-headedness. One of my key adaptations over the past few years has been modifying my exercise routine in order not to trigger this response. I no longer run. I bike regularly, but not intensely and not on hills the way I have always enjoyed. Instead, I have joined a gym where I can work out on exercise machines in a regulated way which usually keeps me from triggering this response to exertion.

I hate the gym. But it’s the only way that I can continue to get the exercise I need.

This is where diagnosis begins to cross over into the realm of self-definition. Because whatever was wrong with me was altering my ability to do the things that make me who I am. I went back to my doctor and tried to explain what I was experiencing. I told him that there seemed to be something larger wrong with me, that these changes were broader than the limited diagnosis he’d given me. He shrugged and said, once again, “welcome to middle age.”


A Million Bucks

It was clearly time to find a new doctor. I talked to a colleague who recommended an Internist she knew. She said: “this guy’s like a dog with a bone when he gets a diagnostic puzzle. He’ll keep working on it until he figures out an answer” That sounded good to me. I met with him and he took a history, gave me a physical. He ran some basic blood tests, all of which came out normal.

“I can run more tests,” he said, “but I’m not sure what they’ll show.”

I asked for a referral to an oncologist. I wanted to rule out any recurrence of the cancer.

Then I had my first real “episode.”

This was in November of 2008. An early snow had fallen – it was wet and heavy. I went out at mid-day to shovel the sidewalk. This is an activity that I ordinarily enjoy. I like the physical work-out, the exertion, and the visible result of my efforts. But this time something started happening to me. I started feeling light-headed. And weak. It was like the experience I’d had while biking, but much more intense. It was a difficult sensation to describe, but I can say that I didn’t feel well connected to my own body and even though I seemed capable of continuing to exert the effort necessary to shovel the snow it didn’t feel like a good idea to keep doing it. And all of the physical sensations seemed oddly focused on the upper half of my body.

It was really strange. It was not something that had ever happened to me before.

My wife looked at me when I came inside and she grew instantly alarmed. She said I looked like a ghost. Which was what I felt like. I recovered after an hour or so and I felt depleted but more or less normal afterwards. My wife got me an appointment with the new doctor for the next day.

“I have an idea about this,” he said. “I don’t think that this is going to be a House episode.”

He gave me an EKG and he thought he saw an abnormality in it. It seemed to be a cardiac issue. I observed his diagnostic certainty. I tried to accept it. Coming from a mental health perspective, I could not think about any diagnosis without also considering the meanings attached to it. What would it mean to me to have heart problems? On one hand, the prospect of a heart attack was frightening. On the other hand, it seemed like one of the most well-understood and treatable of conditions. That was comforting.

But it also just didn’t quite fit. I was a marathon runner. Aside from high cholesterol, which was being adequately treated with statins, I had never had anything that remotely like a heart problem.

The next day I found myself on the treadmill at the cardiologist’s office.

The guy was old-school. Paternalistic and condescending.

“No one ever beats the treadmill,” he said.

But I was a trail runner, accustomed to running straight up the side of mountains. The test required that I get my heart rate up to a certain level at which I would be adequately “stressed.” It took a long time for me to get there. And when I finally did, when I was unplugged from the machine, the doctor came in and told me what I already suspected: my heart was in better condition than 99% of the ordinary population. The abnormality that my internist had seen was actually an artifact of how unusually strong my heart was.

I have struggled throughout this experience with this particular paradox: I look really healthy. That’s one reason why nearly every doctor I have seen throughout this odyssey has suggested that the real diagnosis must be depression, or anxiety, or both. Even though I am more familiar than they are with these diagnoses and their treatments, even though I have described to them the years of therapy I have been through and have outlined the lack of correlation between my mood and my physical symptoms.

“Have you considered going back to a therapist?” one doctor asked me. “Because on paper you look like a million bucks.”

As I began inexplicably losing weight, this disparity between my outward appearance and my inward experience was about to grow even greater.


[In Part Three of this series, I’ll describe my tour of medical specialists, which eventually led us to the Mayo Clinic. And I will further explore the cultural meaning of be identified with a diagnosis.]


Share
© 2011 The Next Ten Minutes Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha