First, the good news…

In my last update I described the medical tests that I was scheduling. I’ve had them all, and they all came back clean.

Arsenic: I re-did the arsenic test that had come out so high during the summer and this time it came back normal. This confirmed my hunch that the high levels on the previous test were the result of the Chinese medicine I’d been taking before the test.

CT scan: a year and half ago, long before I received the Lyme diagnosis, much of my worry about my symptoms centered around a recurrence of cancer. (I’d previously been treated for testicular cancer when I was in my twenties.) At that time I had an abdominal CT scan which showed a few small spots on my spleen, liver and lungs. The doctors weren’t too worried about these but they said that given my history it would be prudent to do a follow-up scan in a year to make sure those spots weren’t growing. The new scan showed that they were stable. In other words, non-cancerous.

MRI: the primary reason for getting an MRI of my head was to make sure that the cause of my human growth hormone deficiency wasn’t a pituitary tumor. In addition, even with the Lyme diagnosis I hadn’t quite stopped worrying that I might have MS. The neurological Lyme symptoms overlap a great deal with MS symptoms. But the scan came back clear. No tumor, no lesions.

All of this is a great relief. It means I can focus on what I know is wrong with me and let go of that lingering anxiety about other possible explanations for my symptoms. I can settle in with two definitive diagnoses. Human growth hormone deficiency and Lyme Disease.

Human Growth

The initial lift I felt when I started supplementing human growth hormone – the improved mood, the sense of physical fluidity – has faded over the past six or seven weeks. It’s possible that this is simply a perceptual issue. As any social psychologist will tell you, a change in state is perceptually more salient than an on-going state. As a change in functioning settles into a stable way of being, it becomes less noticeable. So it could be that the benefit I felt initially is still there but I’m just not experiencing it as acutely.

But I worry that what I’m experiencing is a repetition of something that I’ve felt in the past when I’ve started supplementing other deficient hormones: an initial surge of improvement followed by a rapid return to my previous baseline. I’m certainly not experiencing the common physical benefits that usually come with supplementing HGH…loss of body fat, increased muscle tone, increased exercise tolerance. It’s impossible for me to really sort this out, but I’m concerned that this is my body’s pattern: for whatever reason, I have trouble sustaining the benefits of supplementing any hormones. I want to be wrong about this. For now I’m continuing to give myself the nightly injections.

The causes of my HGH insufficiency remain mysterious. I’ve been asked whether it’s the result of the Lyme. I have no idea and I’m not certain what the mechanism for such an effect would be. I know that  lot of “Lyme literate” physicians

Borrelia

(LLMDs) are aware of the importance of getting hormones in balance as part of an overall treatment plan for Lyme. And I’m very aware that once borrelia (the spirochete that causes Lyme) gets a foothold in the body, it can spread throughout all the body’s systems. So it certainly seems possible that it could mess with the production HGH as well as everything else.

Understanding how my body is responding to continued HGH supplementation feels particularly important because it appeared that an initial effect of the HGH was to clarify the nature of my Lyme symptom cycle. HGH seemed to clear out the symptomalogical static so that, for a few months, a clear pattern could emerge: two bad weeks followed by two not-so-bad weeks. In the past six weeks that pattern has been disrupted (more about that in a moment). What this means is unclear to me, but it complicates my efforts to understand both my Lyme symptoms and my struggles with my hormones.

Existential doubts…an aside

While my naturopath was the one who diagnosed and is treating the human growth hormone deficiency, I continue to work with my internist as well, and (for insurance purposes as much as anything) I wanted him to put in the order for my recent MRI. The conversation I had with him about this was quite fascinating. He had, he reminded me, previously run a test for human growth hormone. His had been a blood test and it had shown normal levels of HGH. I was worried that he was reminding me of this result as a way to argue that the naturopath was wrong and that I shouldn’t be supplementing HGH. But instead he just got a puzzled look and told me that he simply didn’t understand what was going on.

“You’re responding to the treatment,” he said, “and ultimately that’s what matters.”

It is a very unusual thing to have a physician acknowledge the limits of his own knowledge. But what he said next surprised me even more.

“It makes me wonder whether anything we do works at all,” he said. “I think of those studies that show that a significant percentage of people who are ill will get better on their own without treatment. Maybe we do what we do, but people would do just as well without us.”

He mused for awhile longer on the possibility that everything that he had been trained to do was in fact meaningless. I felt an impulse to reassure him. Because it was unnerving to have a person who is caring for you profess such profound existential doubt about his own capacity to help. But I thought about my own experience as a therapist, about how I have experienced similar moments of self doubt and how I have come to accept them as an important part of the process of helping others heal. Those moments are humbling. But they open me up to new ways of thinking about seemingly intractable situations. If I allow myself to experience them fully, they open into transformation.

So I realized that this was an important moment for both my doctor and me. And that, by giving me access to his experience he was truly giving me a gift. I’d spent more than two years in a complex and deeply ambivalent relationship with medical professionals. I desperately wanting them to have the power to be able to figure out what was wrong with me while simultaneously harboring deep suspicions about their capacity to do this.

Here at last was someone who was describing this experience from the other side. The words he was speaking were words I both wanted to hear and feared hearing.

So I stifled the urge to say something comforting to him. I shut myself up and listened. Although it was frightening to me to hear his doubts, I recognized the gift he was giving me by expressing them. In the end I agreed with him that the business of healing is more complex and difficult than either of us could possibly comprehend.

Treatment options

As I’ve settled into my Lyme Disease diagnosis, I’ve discovered that life with Lyme actually has a lot in common with being undiagnosable. The diagnosis is fraught with controversy and confusion. And, as I’ve described in previous posts, treatment is equally fraught. The biggest controversy centers around the use of long-term antibiotics, which many LLMDs and their patients believe is essential for a full recovery from tick-borne illnesses.

But the dilemmas surrounding treatment, I’ve come to realize, are much more confusing and complicated than just that.

I thought, naively as it turns out, that once I found an LLMD my treatment would be fairly straightforward. I knew that it would take time, and that it might not be pleasant…but I didn’t expect it to be mysterious and confusing. Which is exactly what it has turned out to be.

To put it bluntly: there is no single clearly and effective treatment for Lyme Disease. Antibiotics get most of the attention, but even within this approach there are a multitude of types of antibiotics and forms of administration and beliefs about dosing. This book describes the “top ten” Lyme disease treatments. That this book exists tells you something about the state of treatment for Lyme. For most major medical conditions physicians will follow clearly established “standards of practice.” There are always choices in treatment for any illness, but those choices usually involve variations on an agreed-upon protocol.

But with Lyme, it’s a smorgasbord.

Schaller’s book lists, in addition to the “antibiotic rotation protocol,” the Marshal Protocol, the Salt/Vitamin C protocol, detoxification and rife machine therapy, in addition to a set of supportive

Rife Machine

supplemental treatments. Each of these approaches is long and complex. People I’ve spoken to who are following the Marshall Protocol (the micro-biological theory of which is difficult for me to comprehend), tell me that you have to commit to it for at least two years in order to for it to work. That’s a long time frame for a treatment for any disease…especially so for a treatment which may or may not ultimately be effective for you. But unfortunately it’s the status of most if not all Lyme treatments. And that’s where the largest dilemma arises with regard to treatment. Not all treatments work for all people with Lyme. But the only way you can know whether a treatment will work is to stay on it long enough to find out.

As a result, patients need to become experts on their own disease. We need to have enough confidence in our own knowledge about the disease to be able to disagree with the doctors we’ve sought out for help.

This can present a terrible bind.

It’s an emotional bind because we long, when we’re sick, to simply be taken care of by someone who understands our condition better than us.

It’s a cognitive bind because Lyme disease often fogs your brain and makes it difficult to think clearly. For instance, the simple act of reading has become much more difficult for me. It’s not easy to trust a foggy brain to be able to think clearly enough to have a coherent discussion with a physician.

This is simply not a model of medical care that we’re accustomed to. For better or for worse, we’re used to assigning expertise to medical professionals and simply following the treatment recommendations we’re given.

Lyme disease  presents you  with a plethora of possible treatments, many of which have fierce proponents, all of which will require a long-term commitment, but only some of which are actually likely to help you in a significant way at any particular stage of the disease. So you can’t just go to your doctor and ask her what you’re supposed to do. You have to consider that doctor’s beliefs about the disease. Which means that in addition to educating yourself about the micro-biology of Lyme and the mechanisms by which the various treatments work, you’ve also got to educate yourself about your doctor’s position on the disease and on its treatment. Then you’ve got to be willing to hold your own knowledge up to your doctor and be willing to switch to a new doctor if you don’t agree with her approach.

It’s a lot to ask of a person who’s feeling terribly sick most of the time.

Treatment efficacy

Having made the transition from “newly-diagnosed Lymie” to just plain “Lymie,” the most difficult question I face is this: how do I know when a particular treatment is working?

Karl Herxheimer

Am I feeling particularly bad today because it’s part of my usual Lyme cycle? Or is it because the drug I’m taking is killing off the spirochete and the die-off is making me feel worse? The increased symptoms that occur when a treatment is working is known as a “Herxheimer reaction.” “Herxing” can be intense and it’s one of the major miseries endured by people with Lyme. But when you’re “herxing,” it’s a good thing. It means that the treatment is working.

The distinction between core Lyme symptoms and the symptoms of a herxheimer reaction is crucial, but thus far I’ve found that it’s almost impossible for me to sort out the difference. And conversations with other Lymies reveal that this confusion is not at all uncommon.

Since being diagnosed I’ve done several rounds of antibiotics, hydrogen peroxide IVs, and tried several different herbal remedies. (There are a lot more treatments out there than just those “top ten” in Schaller’s book.) Up to this point my naturopath has been willing to shift her approach relatively quickly if a particular treatment doesn’t seem to be working. But I continue to struggle to make sense of the relationship between my physical symptoms and the treatment I’m receiving. My Lyme symptoms change so often that I’m hesitant to attribute any particular meaning to any particular symptom.

So I need to rely on my naturopath to interpret the symptom pattern for me; but I also find myself reluctant to trust her judgment. It’s an aggravating bind.

The treatment I’m following now, as I described in my last update, is called the Zhang protocol. It involves taking a set of Chinese herbal medicines over a period of six months to a year.

A few of my meds

I had an appointment with my naturopath after about three weeks on this treatment. At the time I’d been feeling particularly rotten. A lot of pain in my shoulders and upper arms, heavier than usual fatigue. I was frustrated by a lack of improvement and when I went in for the appointment I was ready to ask for a referral to a doctor who would prescribe antibiotics. But when I described to her what I was experiencing she felt strongly that this was a herxheimer reaction to the herbal medicine I’d been taking.

Was it? Honestly I still have no idea. In the days after that visit my experience was mixed. I had a few good days and a week or so that pretty miserable. At present I’ve been enjoying a reprieve from most of my symptoms. It’s been about a week and it’s a relief.

But I have to say, as an aside, that it feels like I’m not telling the whole story when I describe the good weeks in which my symptoms abate. Because these days the point of comparison for everything I experience  is my most recent Lyme flare-up. So when I say I feel better, it means that that my most miserable symptoms aren’t present. As a result, it inevitably occurs to me a few days into feeling better that there’s another, more important point of comparison: how I felt before all of this started in the first place. Then I realize that I’m keeping myself feeling better by avoiding a number of physical activities – running, skiing, shoveling snow, or even having sex – that will inevitably send me on a downward spiral. It’s a depressing but an inescapable thought; better in the short term is a far cry from regaining the capacity that I’ve lost since all this started.

In terms of treatment I’m left wondering: was the pattern that seemed to establish itself (two good weeks, two bad weeks) a true pattern in the first place? I simply can’t get a good read on any of it. But given the choice between continuing a treatment that might be starting to work or jumping ship and starting in a new direction, I’ve decided to stick it out with the Zhang protocol for the time being.

Community

Although Lyme obviously exists here in Montana, it’s not terribly common. I know a few people who have or had it and it’s great to talk to them. But it’s not enough. There’s something terribly lonely about the experience of chronic illness. For one thing, it’s usually invisible to people around you. Most of the time I look fine. Even if I’m feeling awful.

When you live with this disjunction between your appearance and your experience you inevitably start to feel isolated. Inside your mind the flow of your days is defined by your shifting symptoms. It’s what you think about most of the time, whether you want to or not. But there’s only so much of this you can report to those around you. Even to those who love you the most. You risk becoming an awfully tedious person, constantly describing your aches and pains, your fears about your health and your sorrow and grief about the life you’ve lost.

So one of the most important things I’ve found for myself is the on-line community of Lymies. It’s the universal algorithm of support groups: those who are going through the same thing you’re going through “just get it.” They can understand not only the surface meaning of what you say but also everything behind it.

Being understood is healing. This feels as important for me as any medical treatment I’m receiving. I don’t necessarily trust any of these treatment to work, and I know that if it does it may take a long time. But I do trust the capacity of others with Lyme to understand what I’m going through and to offer their support.

And it’s good to discover something that remains constant in this perpetually shifting disease.

 

 

Read the next post in the Life with Lyme series here.

 

 

Share
 

Part 4: Testing negative

 

[In part three of this series post I explored my evolving symptoms through the challenges of differential diagnosis. This post describes the turning point at which anxiety turned to fear, as I begin to consider diagnostic possibilities that seem truly unbearable.]


Iatrogenesis

In my mind I kept going back to cancer. As a survivor of that disease, I’ve always held a certain fear that it would recur. I asked my primary doctor for a referral to an oncologist, which he gave me. While we were waiting for that appointment, I had a regular follow-up appointment with my endocrinologist. I described the muscle spasms, the weakness, the weight loss. I told him about our appointment with the oncologist.

There’s no harm in doing that, he said. But it sounds to me like you ought to see a neurologist.

A neurologist?

Really?

That came as a genuine surprise to me. I thought of neurologists as people who do brain surgery. Which is to say I hadn’t given them much thought at all. I had certainly never taken the trouble to think through the fact that disorders of the nerves that run through our bodies are the specialty of neurologists. It had certainly never occurred to me that nerves are the mechanism which trigger muscle movement. When I experienced a muscle spasm, that was a neuromuscular event.

The thought of needing a neurologist alarmed me more than anything else had thus far. While I didn’t like to be going to an oncologist, at least that was familiar territory. Neurology was something else altogether, a land of unfamiliar and truly frightening possibilities.

I began reading about the possible causes of muscle twitches and spasms. They ranged from benign to awful. I learned the word fasciculation. I learned that muscle fasciculations were an early sign of ALS. I didn’t know much about ALS. Not yet. But it sounded awful.

I certainly didn’t think I had that.

The oncologist considered my history, did a brief physical exam and said that although he had no explanation for my weight loss, it seemed unlikely to him that the cause of my problems was a recurrence of the cancer. What about Multiple Myeloma, I asked? I’d been reading about this form of cancer, how it could strike people who had been previously treated for and recovered from cancer.

I started tracking down the research on the long-term sequelae of testicular cancer and learned the rate of recurrence was significant, years and even decades after the original treatment. And of course it was the treatment itself which could be the cause…radiation kills cancer cells but it also causes cancer.

There’s a word for that: iatrogenic. It’s a complex and, to me, an oddly beautiful concept. It speaks to the hard truth that the art of healing creates opportunities for the development of new illness.

It can happen in many ways. Gathering patients together in hospitals and clinics concentrates communicable diseases in one place and gives them the chance to spread. The invasive nature of many medical procedures also creates opportunities for infections. And, as with cancer treatment, there are times when the only thing that can heal us is something that simultaneously does us harm.

It’s a term that mental health professionals rarely use…although it probably should be a part of our vocabulary. The reason we don’t use it is in large part due to the nature of the diagnostic system for mental disorders. Unlike medical diagnosis, the DSM is agnostic as to the causes of mental disorders. It seeks only to identify them, not (with a few small exceptions) to identify what led to them.

Although this makes for a clearer diagnostic manual, it belies a deeper human truth. Because whether a diagnosis is medical or psychological, one of the first things anyone asks upon receiving it is: why?

In my case, I was looking at causes precisely because I didn’t have a diagnosis. I was starting from the most logical cause I could locate in my history. Which was cancer.

It was a decent theory, which was only strengthened when I read an account of another testicular cancer survivor who later developed Multiple Myeloma. His first symptom? Muscle weakness.

I asked the oncologist if I could have it.

Not likely, he said. If so it would have shown up on your blood tests. Nevertheless, he said, with your history and your symptoms it’s worth doing some scans.

So I had chest and abdominal CAT scans, which came back showing no major abnormalities. Although, he said, there were a few small spots here and there. A lot of people have those, he added. Usually they’re benign.

Still, he said, it’s probably worth following-up with another scan in a year, just to be sure.

 

Imagining the worst

So was cancer ruled-out?

It wasn’t clear. Cancer wasn’t the likely cause of my problems, but there was certainly room to worry. If I chose to.

To put this another way: is a diagnosis – or a diagnostic rule-out – valid if the patient doesn’t believe it?

Does diagnostic certainty require consensus?

In many cases, particularly in cases of a clear affirmative diagnosis, the answer is obviously no. A malignant tumor in the brain means brain cancer, even if the patient happens to be in denial about it.

But it’s a different situation when it comes to rule-outs. If you test negative for cancer (or for MS, or Lyme Disease or Celiac), but you’re still experiencing the symptoms of that condition…if you don’t fully trust the results of the tests…if you still don’t have an adequate explanation for why you feel the way you do…then in certain ways nothing is ever ruled out.

After all, you can’t disprove a negative.

With each new test suggesting that I didn’t have this or that disease, the thought began growing in the back of my mind. What if I just happen to be hyper-sensitive to the early signs of whatever condition this is? What if it hasn’t grown strong enough yet to show up on the tests? Do I just have to wait until things get worse before I can get diagnosed and treated? Isn’t the value of early detection supposed to drive effective treatment?

These questions were only going to grow more pointed and more maddening.

The first available appointment with a neurologist was months out in the future. While waiting, I tried to diagnose myself using the information I could obtain over the Internet. I learned a lot, in an unstructured sort of way which left me wide open to bouts of pure panic. About ALS in particular. Because any search of my primary symptoms – muscle weakness, fasciculations, weight loss – always led me straight to ALS. The more I let myself recognize that this was possible, the more aggravating it became that I couldn’t get a timely appointment with a specialist who was qualified to diagnose it.

“We’re not a critical care facility,” the receptionist at the neurologist’s office icily informed me when I called to push for an earlier opening.

It was disturbing to realize what a powerful role the simple task of scheduling an appointment could play in the diagnostic process. “Early detection” may be the stated goal of healthcare professionals, but because detection can’t happen without examination, it hinges in a concrete way on the mechanics of scheduling.

We learned that a new neurologist was moving to our town and my wife managed to get me an appointment with her on her first morning of work here. Arriving in her office felt like an epic accomplishment. Here was a person, I let myself hope, who could finally tell me what was wrong with me.

She listened to my story and did a full neurological exam. She couldn’t see anything abnormal on the exam, but she ordered a new batch of blood tests and MRIs of my brain and spine. She scheduled me for an EMG and a nerve conduction test the next week.

At first I didn’t fully comprehend what was at stake with this particular test, in which needles would be inserted into my muscles and the electrical activity of those muscles is measured. In ALS the motor neurons (which direct voluntary movement of muscles) degenerate and die. If you’ve got ALS, you’ll have abnormal results on an EMG.

This test, I gradually let myself realize, might tell me that I was about to begin a rapid descent into paralysis and death.

In addition to the obvious emotional stress, that EMG was one of the most physically painful procedures I’ve had to endure. The sensation of that thick needle penetrating muscles was excruciating. But once it was over, the neurologist looked at us calmly and said she didn’t see any sign of ALS. She said that the MRIs hadn’t shown any sign of MS. She said that I didn’t have Parkinson’s. She said that my blood tests came back negative for Celiac, Lyme, AIDS and a bunch of other things that might potentially cause my symptoms.

I’m not sure what to tell you, she said. But those are things that in my opinion you definitely don’t have.

It should have been a relief. I tried hard to make myself feel that. I don’t have ALS, I repeated to myself. I don’t have ALS. I tried to make it sound true. But because her answer was entirely in the realm of the negative – things I didn’t have – and because the same symptoms that I’d been experiencing were steadily growing worse, I found that I couldn’t convert this absence of diagnosis into feeling of comfort.

I discovered that as long as I was still experiencing the same symptoms, I didn’t feel any relief. There was no way that someone telling me I was fine was going to feel like a resolution. The only relief that I could imagine would have been a clear explanation of my symptoms, a definitive diagnosis.

But I remained undiagnosable.

The neurologist seemed confident and competent. But when you’re as unsettled as I was, you can figure out ways to doubt anyone.

Just how certain was she about the test results?

We asked her.

This is the way it looks to me, she said. But if you want to feel more confidence about this, you should definitely get a second opinion. I would completely understand if you chose to do that.

You could even go to the Mayo Clinic, she said, if that you would set your minds to rest.


[Part five of this series will range from the most traditional Western medical approaches to diagnosis and treatment, exemplified by the Mayo Clinic, with some of extremely non-Western approaches which I also embraced.]



Share
 

Part One: Prelude


Unknowing

Much of my life over the past few years has been consumed with a single, urgent question: what is wrong with me?

In setting out to tell this story, I’m acutely aware that it’s going to sound like a medical mystery narrative. It’s going to read a little like a treatment for an episode of House, M.D.

Because of this I know that as you read this you’re almost certainly going to have advice for me. You’ll have theories about what’s going on with my body and you’re going to have advice for me about how to navigate a massively dysfunctional healthcare system.

That’s great, go for it. I’m all ears.

But know that while diagnostic questions make up the raw material for this story, it’s not really what the story is about. The real subject here is epistemological. Which is to say that it’s about how we come to know what we believe we know about ourselves. It’s about what happens to us when we can’t make sense of our own experience. It’s about the difference between how we define ourselves and the ways in which we are defined by others. And, more than anything else, it’s about what happens when our own capacity for definition fails us.

By the end there will be some answers. But inevitably those answers will raise a whole series of new questions. Because just as the process of assigning a diagnosis gives rise to impossible dilemmas, so does the process of living with one. And in the end this is a story about living in a state of unknowing.


Starting points: five diagnostic dilemmas

I have been unwell for at least two years, and I have not been able to get an answer to that seemingly simple question: what’s wrong?

It’s difficult to pinpoint the precise starting point for this story. There are many symptomatic markers, but in the absence of a clear diagnosis none of them point to a reliable starting place.


A first diagnostic dilemma: when does an illness begin?


I’ve often wondered if it didn’t start as long as four or five years ago, when I began noticing a gradual decline in my sexual functioning. My libido was dropping, and I began experiencing erectile dysfunction.

Because I am a psychotherapist, I naturally turned first to psychological explanations. In addition to being a clinician, I’ve been a patient in some form of psychotherapy for most of my adult life. I have a history of anxiety and depression once acute but at this point largely under control. There were current stresses that seemed like they could be causing the problem, not the least of which was the fact that my wife was publishing a frank memoir in which she openly discussed her past sexual history. That would be enough to put many men into a sexual crisis. So it seemed like the logical place to start in the search for answers.

 

Diagnostic dilemma number two: how do you distinguish between psychological and physical causes of an illness?


There was a part of me that really wanted the problem to be  psychological. Because that would mean, in some sense, that I was in control of it. I knew how to do the emotional work, I felt confident that if that’s where the problem was, I would be able to work through it.

So I dug in. Three more years of intense work with a very good and very expensive individual therapist (one outcome of years of having done years of psychotherapy is that insurance companies treat any mental health diagnosis as pre-existing symptoms and refuse to cover it), in conjunction with the on-going marital therapy my wife and I were doing with another very good (and equally expensive) therapist.

Inevitably, as I did this emotional work I re-encountered parts of my psyche that were informing my current sexual experience. I faced it all head on. By this point in my life this was very familiar terrain. In fact, I was discovering that after years of work the charge had largely gone out of my past trauma. I could directly face the experiences which had affected me so negatively in the past. I could acknowledge the pain without feeling overwhelmed by it.

To me that has always been a pretty good definition of mental health.

But something didn’t fit. Because no matter how emotionally clear I felt, I was still a mess in bed. I could rarely maintain an erection for more than a few minutes and often I couldn’t get one at all. Even worse, the energy of desire itself was continuing to drain out of me. Left to my own devices, sex wouldn’t cross my mind at all for days or weeks. And even in those rare moments when I felt a clear, strong, psychological desire, the physical problems remained.

Finally, reluctantly, I went to my physician and described what was going on. He said, in effect, “welcome to middle age,” as he handed me a prescription for Cialis.

 

Diagnostic dilemma number three: how do you differentiate the onset of illness from the processes of normative development?


Cialis worked inconsistently, which proved to be a worse experience than having it not work at all. The same with Viagra and Levitra. And the more I understood about the erectile dysfunction they were designed to treat, the more I understood that there was no reason they should have helped. Whatever was going on with me, it wasn’t a blood flow issue. It was something else.

I began to think back to my medical history. In 1985 I had a bout with testicular cancer. I had a tumor on one testicle which was removed. After that I’d spent six weeks receiving a heavy prophylactic dose of radiation. Was that the real starting point? Twenty-three years earlier?

 

Diagnostic dilemma number four: how do you distinguish between the recurrence of a pre-existing condition and the onset of a new illness?


(This is not just a medical question, of course. It’s a reimbursement issue, as I discovered during the original cancer treatment, none of which was covered by my insurance because my doctor had observed in his notes that I had discovered the lump prior to being enrolled in my current insurance plan.)

After the surgery and radiation, I was a compliant patient. I followed up on all my post-surgery check-ups. And I was given a clean bill of health. But decades later as I began looking into the research, I learned that there could be long-term delayed consequences of both the cancer and the radiation. I had to wonder if that wasn’t the cause of my problems. I pressed my doctor to check my testosterone levels and to provide me with a referral to an endocrinologist.

The endocrinologist verified that my testosterone levels were low. (“Inadequate testicular functioning,” were the depressing words he used as he diagnosed me with the equally depressing word, “hypogonadism.”) But, he said, what concerns me more are your thyroid levels.

Hypothyroid. A second diagnosis, one I’d never considered even though I’m well aware that hypothyroidism is a common physical cause of depression, not to mention that it’s bound up with a variety of problems with sexual functioning.

He put me on both testosterone replacement and a thyroid medication.

This left one question unaddressed: were these two diagnoses related, or did they represent different aspects of the same underlying issue?

 

Diagnostic dilemma number five: how do you determine whether you are dealing with a single syndrome as it evolves over time, or whether are you looking at two or more co-occuring conditions?


There was no way to answer this question, but I allowed myself to hope that this diagnosis and treatment was going to turn things around for me. I even let myself imagine that it might address problems that I’d been enduring for decades, like the occasional bouts of low-level depression that I had resigned myself to living with. I was genuinely hopeful that things were going to get better.


A final dilemma

Most of what I’m describing here happened a little over two years ago, in the spring and summer of 2008. I added the new medications to the statin and the antidepressant that I was already taking. I started scanning myself for improvements. And at first the medication did seem to help…a little. I felt a bit more energy, a bit more sexual interest. I tried to leverage that small feeling of improvement into something more. I tried to convince myself that the drugs were helping more than they actually seemed to be.

What’s odd, looking back, is how well I was functioning at that time compared to how I feel today. Back then I had a decent amount of energy. I was still getting up early in the mornings to do long trail runs, often up to the top of the mountain near our house. I’d been a runner for a long time and it was an activity that in many ways defined me. I’d run five full marathons by then, the most recent one in 2006 in New Orleans.

Really, anyone looking at me would have said that I was in great shape.

And I had a clear diagnosis, two of them in fact, clearly defined by blood tests. I was treating them effectively. After some fine-tuning the endocrinologist announced that my testosterone and thyroid levels were both right where they should be.

But nothing was changing much. Not my sexual functioning, not my mood. Not really.

So I was left with yet another dilemma: what does it mean when a person receives an accurate diagnosis and treats the illness adequately and still continues to experience the same symptoms?

That question would soon grow urgent.

Because, symptomatically at least, things had just barely gotten started.


[Part two of this series will look at my experience of a puzzling set of new symptoms through the lens of my experience teaching diagnosis.]

Share
© 2011 The Next Ten Minutes Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha